Pekka Juhani Aittakumpu

PEP | FIN

Last update: 17/10/2025

Name: Pekka Juhani Aittakumpu

Birth: 1981 Oulu

Sanctions

—

Adverse media

—

Charges

Public charges

Relationships

—

Adverse info

—

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Does Pekka Juhani Aittakumpu have any sanctions?

No, Pekka Juhani Aittakumpu currently has no sanctions but might have them in the future. Would you like to receive an alert?

2. Is Pekka Juhani Aittakumpu a PEP (Politically Exposed Person)?

Yes, Pekka Juhani Aittakumpu is considered a PEP under the following countries' regulations: Finland , Finland , Finland .

3. What is the relationship between Pekka Juhani Aittakumpu and the AML regulation in Finland?

Pekka Juhani Aittakumpu is a relevant person under Finland's AML regulation because they are or were considered a Politically Exposed Person.

4. What is the relationship between Pekka Juhani Aittakumpu and the AML regulation in Finland?

Pekka Juhani Aittakumpu is a relevant person under Finland's AML regulation because they are or were considered a Politically Exposed Person.

5. What is the relationship between Pekka Juhani Aittakumpu and the AML regulation in Finland?

Pekka Juhani Aittakumpu is a relevant person under Finland's AML regulation because they are or were considered a Politically Exposed Person.

6. Can I receive automatic alerts about PEPs (Politically Exposed Person)?

Yes, Pibisi collects PEP lists from multiple sources and official websites, helping you monitor your clients, investors, or persons of interest.

7. Where does this information come from?

Pibisi's proprietary AML database gathers all of its information from public, official, online AML lists and institutional websites. These are the sources that contain information about Pekka Juhani Aittakumpu:

Name	Info	Source
Website of the Parliament of the Republic of Finland	PEPs	FIN

The information relating to this subject may be incomplete or deliberately obscured. Its use for the creation of user profiles is not permitted. To access the complete information and have an appropriate basis for legitimisation, it is necessary to accredit the status of an Obligated Subject in terms of Money Laundering Prevention and to contract unrestricted access to our database.