Anna Anni Henriikka Savolainen-Tapaninen

Was PEP | FIN

Last update: 15/07/2025

Name: Anna Anni Henriikka Savolainen-Tapaninen

Birth: 1875 Nilsiä

Sanctions

—

Adverse media

—

Charges

Public charges

Relationships

—

Adverse info

—

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Does Anna Anni Henriikka Savolainen-Tapaninen have any sanctions?

No, Anna Anni Henriikka Savolainen-Tapaninen currently has no sanctions but might have them in the future. Would you like to receive an alert?

2. Is Anna Anni Henriikka Savolainen-Tapaninen a PEP (Politically Exposed Person)?

No, Anna Anni Henriikka Savolainen-Tapaninen is not currently considered a PEP, but was in the past according to the following country regulations: Finland , Finland .

3. What is the relationship between Anna Anni Henriikka Savolainen-Tapaninen and the AML regulation in Finland?

Anna Anni Henriikka Savolainen-Tapaninen is a relevant person under Finland's AML regulation because they are or were considered a Politically Exposed Person.

4. What is the relationship between Anna Anni Henriikka Savolainen-Tapaninen and the AML regulation in Finland?

Anna Anni Henriikka Savolainen-Tapaninen is a relevant person under Finland's AML regulation because they are or were considered a Politically Exposed Person.

5. Can I receive automatic alerts about PEPs (Politically Exposed Person)?

Yes, Pibisi collects PEP lists from multiple sources and official websites, helping you monitor your clients, investors, or persons of interest.

6. Where does this information come from?

Pibisi's proprietary AML database gathers all of its information from public, official, online AML lists and institutional websites. These are the sources that contain information about Anna Anni Henriikka Savolainen-Tapaninen:

Name	Info	Source
Website of the Parliament of the Republic of Finland	PEPs	FIN

The information relating to this subject may be incomplete or deliberately obscured. Its use for the creation of user profiles is not permitted. To access the complete information and have an appropriate basis for legitimisation, it is necessary to accredit the status of an Obligated Subject in terms of Money Laundering Prevention and to contract unrestricted access to our database.